October 16Oct 16 So.... given the Honda XL750 Transalp’s revival as a modern mid-weight adventure bike built around the same 755cc Unicam parallel twin engine as the CB750 Hornet, how do you evaluate Honda’s engineering compromises between off-road ruggedness and on-road refinement, especially considering factors like the throttle mapping across its multiple ride modes, the Showa SFF-CA suspension’s adjustability and real world response under varying loads etc. and the interplay between the bike’s electronic aids (traction control, ABS modulation, and engine braking management) during mixed surface transitions?Does anyone think the Transalp’s ergonomics, wind protection, and chassis geometry position it as a true long distance contender against segment benchmarks like the KTM 890 Adventure and BMW F850GS, or does it lean more toward being a versatile commuter-adventurer that prioritises accessibility over it's extreme performance?what are your thoughts?
October 16Oct 16 I personally like the Transalp (and indeed the earlier versions of the model) and considering the size and the weight is more than adequate to tackle most terrains without the constraints of the bulk of the Africa Twin.As for tarmac usage, it tackles all the obstacles of traffic and potholes admirably....you won't hear any complaints from me, It's a great bike!
October 17Oct 17 Agreed, had a Bagster gel seat on my GS1200 and I think it was a Corben on my Bandit 1200 - huge difference when you're travelling through Europe
Create an account or sign in to comment